A+ R A-

Who's Afraid of the Coming White Backlash?

Rate this item
(2 votes)

 

All my adult life I have been reminded of impending "White backlash" as something to be feared. I don't fear White anger at my legitimate demands anymore.

A musician-actor named Marvin Lee Aday, whose genius is that he now goes by the moniker "Meat Loaf" – and others like him – have some quaking in their boots again because Meat Loaf has warned of a "storm cloud" over America, and we're not talking about Superstorm Sandy. He is talking about the re-election of President Barack Obama.

But after we laugh at all the joke lines about the etch-a-sketch, gaffe-filled, myth-a-minute campaign of Gov. Mitt Romney – who, with no shame at all, just last week purchased $5,000 worth of canned goods from a local Walmart store to give to his supporters at a rally so they could "donate" the supplies back to him at a rally in front of TV cameras to ostensibly help East Coast hurricane victims – when we pick ourselves up off the floor about all the stupid lies and tricks he and his sidekick Rep. Paul Ryan perpetrated in order to steal – not win fair and square – the election, there is this serious concern about the White backlash.

A number of "legitimate" White political thinkers are arguing that the Obama re-election will lead to White southern politicians once again advocating secession. They're delusional.

By the 1980s, the most vicious end game of the race-baiting Romney presidential campaign mindset – the Ku Klux Klan – had dwindled to around 600 chapters. After the election of President Obama in 2008, their numbers surged once again. Now, they are poised for an even greater comeback, this time, right out in the open and with the witting or unwitting blessing [or denial of their threat] from most of the GOP establishment.

The only problem is their antebellum vision is doomed for the trash heap of human history. The proverbial genie is out of the bottle. The toothpaste is out of the tube. They cannot be put back inside. Sorry race-hating White folks.

The secessionists tried this same, lame strategy in 1861. It didn't work for them then. It won't work now. The Confederate States of America [the original backlashers] was composed of millions of White traitors. They betrayed their country, and they failed in their rebellion. They had the most brilliant general in the U.S. military leading them and they were crushed by the Union with the help of the slaves.

They were crushed thanks in large measure to the very slaves whom they held in contempt. They didn't win then. Their successors cannot win now!

"Unconditional surrender." Those were the terms when Gen. Robert E. Lee gave his sword to Gen. U.S. Grant at the Appomattox, Virginia Courthouse in 1865 ending the Civil War. Unconditional surrender, Johnny Reb. Unconditional surrender, Tea Party, or whatever name by which you identify your racist crusade today. Yours is truly "The Lost Cause" for a reason.

Those who would embrace, or revive, those antiquated notions of American hegemony in the 21st century are badly mistaken. They think America – with strong White leadership again in charge – can impose its will on the rest of the non-White world and "win by winning" like they did before. It can't happen like that again.

The path of the backlashers today heads down the road to treason. For his part in the 1861 traitorous adventure, Gen. Lee was punished by the revocation of his citizenship, which was not restored until 110 years after his death! It took an act of Congress to make that traitor – who already had roads and schools named for him – an "American" citizen again. Did I already say these ideas belong on the trash heap of history? Well they do.

On the other hand, the legitimate insistence on the part of Black people for freedom, justice and equality cannot for long still be denied. The delusional American Exceptionalism crowd cannot govern, or dominate in the world without the willing, voluntary, enthusiastic participation of the 47 percent in this country who they believe don't take responsibility for their own lives, and the participation of the others they have kicked to the curb this election season – such as Black people and Latinos, whose "dream" path to citizenship they've thwarted.

So the Romney vision cannot be achieved unless, that is, the folks who have benefited most from the subjugation of the downtrodden are willing to abandon their notion of White privilege, and stand up and fight their own wars, and do their own dirty work. Fat chance of that happening.

5 comments

  • mike

    are you black racists forgetting that it is people like i and other whites who make up 79 percent of the population in the u.s.' and that i "a person that did not choose my race at my conception."went out and voted for the president.so it was actually the whites who made the majority of Obama votes.it's awful to learn that educated people can still write such racism in reverse.you should be happy that whites seem to be really voting on the presidents character and not the color of his skin, which none of us have control over.I know ;SO Cleche' but it's the absolute truth !

    mike Monday, 19 November 2012 05:22 Comment Link
  • Mantan

    I think this article speaks for itself. But the sheer idiocy of the comment from dG requires a rejoinder, because there are others who think like him and like Steve Pearlman. 1. White people stole America from its Native inhabitants and committed genocide against them and therefore have no moral basis for considering the USA to be a White enclave. 2. White people stole millions of people from Africa and forced them to work for 310 years in chattel slavery, which accounts for this country's wealth and for the presence of Africans in this country. And most importantly to dG's misinformed screed: 3. White people are "genetically recessive," that is if they inter-marry with anyone, the resulting offspring will no longer be Caucasian. So if White people migrated in peace to Africa not as colonialists, they would in a few generations become Africans, if they inter-mingle that is. White people want to hold on to their un-sustainable notion of Manifest Destiny or White Privilege as a purely White Tribe, even by force and intimidation which is the point of this article. It won't work. That KKK-thug thing is a fight White people cannot win today because they are not only genetically inferior to the darker races, they are also numerically inferior. Yes they have all the guns now, but in this day and time as has been proven in all of America's recent Asian wars: You can't win anymore by winning. Give up the ghost dG. Give up the ghost Steve Perlman. Make your way to Appomattox, not to The Alamo guys.

    Mantan Sunday, 11 November 2012 15:11 Comment Link
  • dG

    "ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!"

    Everybody says there is a problem called White Privilege. Everybody says this White Privilege problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

    The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve Asian Privilege by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

    Everybody says the final solution to this White Privilege problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

    What if I said there was this problem called Black Privilege and this Black Privilege would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

    How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a Black Privilege problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

    And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

    But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

    They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

    dG Sunday, 11 November 2012 13:46 Comment Link
  • Shii

    Well Mr. Pearlman, there is a saying "if it doesn't apply let it fly" which I think you might find useful and just in case u didnt know what racism is I included Merriam-Webster's definition: "a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.." As u can u see NOTHING about this article is racist. Unless you consider pointing out blatant racism in this country & your mention of "firing a few select people" whom i assume are black..racist.

    Shii Thursday, 08 November 2012 18:41 Comment Link
  • Steve Pearlman

    Nice racist article....It's great to see racism against whites is so in fashion....I can't change the world but I can fire a few select people in your honor.

    Steve Pearlman Thursday, 08 November 2012 05:53 Comment Link

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated. HTML code is not allowed.

Featured Poll

Do you agree with Mayor Vincent Gray’s decision to enable the Department of Motor Vehicles to issue a driver's license, learner's permit, or identification card to undocumented District residents?