A+ R A-

Politics Fuel Debate on Gas

Rate this item
(2 votes)
Politics Fuel Debate on Gas Courtesy Photo

Republicans are so intent on defeating President Barack Obama in November that they have accused him of deliberately raising the price of gasoline.

Obama pointed out the ridiculousness of that argument during a recent news conference. Replying to a question from Ed Henry of Fox News, Obama said: "Ed, just from a political perspective, do you think the president of the United States going into re-election wants gas prices to go higher?" Obama said. "Is there anybody here who thinks that makes a lot of sense?"

But Republicans and journalists employed by conservative news organizations are not the only people blaming the president for high gas prices, which are hovering around $3.80 a gallon, a 29.5-cent increase over the past month.

A CBS/New York Times poll this month found that 54 percent of Americans believe the president "can do a lot about" gas prices. Consequently, Obama saw his job rating drop from 50 percent in February to 41 percent this month, a period that coincides with rising gas prices.

Republican presidential contenders are also pointing the fingers at Obama, with Newt Gingrich promising policies that would bring gas down to $2.50 a gallon.

Without mentioning Gingrich by name, White House Press Secretary said, "Any politician who says that is lying." He explained, "That strategy does not exist. It is a simple fact that there is no such plan that can guarantee the price of oil or the price at the pump."

The reality is that gasoline prices are set on the world market, not 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Center, the cost of crude oil accounts for 76 percent of the price of a gallon of regular gas. Refining costs and profits are responsible for 6 percent, distribution marketing and retail costs add another 6 percent and taxes contributes another 12 percent.

As Steven Mufson writes in the Washington Post, "Today's oil prices are the product of years and decades of exploration, automobile design and ingrained consumer habits combined with political events in places such as Sudan and Libya, anxiety about possible conflict with Iran, and the energy aftershocks of last year's earthquake in Japan."

FackCheck.org dissects the numbers game.

"The president said that [oil] imports declined last year to less than 50 percent of U.S. consumption, while the Kentucky senator (Mitch McConnell) warned that the U.S. imports 60 percent of our oil. McConnell was talking about total imports, while Obama was talking about net imports (total imports minus exports). Both can claim to be correct, but the EIA [Energy Information Administration] sides with Obama's match when gauging U.S. dependency on foreign oil."

Writing on her Facebook page, Sarah Palin accused President Obama of "allowing America to remain increasingly dependent on imports from foreign oil regimes in dangerously unstable parts of the world."

FackCheck.org noted that the U.S. imported 2.3 million barrels a day from 13 countries in the Middle East in 2012, down from 3 million barrels a day in 2008. There was an 8 percent decline

in imports from Africa.

"The U.S. actually imports more petroleum from our northern neighbor, Canada, than it does from any other country," the fact-checking organization stated. "And Canada does not appear on the State Department's list of 'dangerous or unstable nations.' Nor do Venezuela, Russia, Angola, Brazil, the United Kingdom, Ecuador, the Virgin Islands or Kuwait, which are all in the the top 15 countries from which the U.S. imports oil and other petroleum products."

This is the kind of perspective largely missing from news coverage of the issue, according to Media Matters, the watchdog group. It reported, "In total, 63% of those interviewed or quoted on gas prices by cable outlets were political figures (including politicians, strategists, White House officials and campaign advisors), and only 13% were economists or oil industry experts."

Americans tend to have short memories. Gas was $1.89 when Obama first assumed office. But just six months earlier, it was $4.11 under President George W. Bush, according to GasBuddy.com.

Republicans, with a "drill, baby, drill" mentality, have attacked President Obama for not issuing enough permits to drill. However, the drilling-rig count is twice as high as it was in 2009.

In his weekly radio address last Saturday, President Obama said gasoline prices are part of a larger issue.

"The recent spike in gas prices has been another painful reminder of why we have to invest in this technology," he said. "As usual, politicians have been rolling out their three-point plans for $2 gas: drill, drill, and drill some more. Well, my response is, we have been drilling. Under my administration, oil production in America is at an eight-year high. We've quadrupled the number of operating oil rigs, and opened up millions of acres for drilling."

He continued. "But you and I both know that with only 2 percent of the world's oil reserves, we can't just drill our way to lower gas prices – not when we consume 20 percent of the world's oil. We need an all-of-the-above strategy that relies less on foreign oil and more on American-made energy – solar, wind, natural gas, biofuels, and more."

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated. HTML code is not allowed.

Featured Poll

Do you agree with Mayor Vincent Gray’s decision to enable the Department of Motor Vehicles to issue a driver's license, learner's permit, or identification card to undocumented District residents?