A+ R A-

A Marissa Alexander Retrial?

Rate this item
(2 votes)

In an unexpected new development, the Florida case of Marissa Alexander, 31, will be the subject of a retrial motion next week with the sentencing delayed. During a pre-sentencing hearing this morning in Jacksonville, FL, Circuit Judge James Daniel agreed to hear arguments from both sides on the question of whether a retrial will be granted in her case.

Arguments will be heard on Monday, April 30. Through a spokeswoman, prosecutor Nicholas Lake said he'd make "no further comments" regarding the case.

New attention on Melissa Alexander's case spearheaded by her first husband, Lincoln Alexander – who created the website, Justice for Marissa – would appear to have had an effect. After telling Marissa Alexander's story during interviews with Black Talk Radio News and Michael Baisden last week, Lincoln Alexander appeared on CNN with Anderson Cooper. A petition drive in support of Marissa Alexander is also underway. Lincoln Alexander attended the pre-sentencing hearing today and informed Politic365 of Judge Daniel's action.

Marissa Alexander faces a mandatory minimum sentence of twenty years in prison after being convicted in 2011 of three counts of aggravated assault with no intent to kill or harm. In 2010, during an argument with her second husband at their home in Jacksonville, she fired a bullet into the ceiling of their home. Alexander asserted that she fired the weapon to ward off an attack from her husband. Alexander shot no one nor was anyone injured during the incident.

During Marissa Alexander's trial, a motion to invoke Florida's stand-your-ground law on her behalf was denied by Circuit Court Judge Elizabeth Senterfitt. Since February 2011, Marissa Alexander, the mother of three children, has been behind bars.

The application of the stand-your-ground law in Florida would appear to be highly subjective. Though Marissa Alexander had no obligation to retreat when her husband allegedly assaulted her, Judge Senterfitt reasoned that Alexander could have exited the home during the attack when she ruled against Alexander's stand-your-ground motion.

Late Sunday night, George Zimmerman, who killed Trayvon Martin on February 26, was released from police custody in Sanford, FL after he was granted a $150,000 bond by Judge Kenneth Lester on April 20. Zimmerman had been previously arrested for felony assault on a police officer in 2005. Zimmerman was also granted permission to leave the state of Florida.

Zimmerman had already been free from the night of February 26 until 46 days later when, after much protest and media attention, he was charged and arrested on April 11 with second degree murder by Florida special prosecutor Angela Corey. The U.S. Justice Department is also conducting an investigation of Martin's killing.

Judge Daniel could be taking a new look at the case of Marissa Alexander. The Jacksonville NAACP Chapter President, Isiah Rumlin wrote Judge Daniel regarding Melissa Alexander's case. "We take issue with the State denying her (Alexander's) right to claim self-defense under Florida's 'Stand Your Ground' law.' [Alexander] did all that she possibly could to protect herself from her husband at the time, including an injunction for protection against violence, which was active on the day of the incident," the letter in part read.

The National Bar Association, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, the NAACP, members of the Congressional Black Caucus, the Rev. Al Sharpton and many others are challenging the stand-your-ground laws. The laws, enacted in twenty five states, have coincided with an increase in "justifiable" homicide cases.

LAUREN VICTORIA BURKE, Politic365 Chief Congressional Correspondent, publishes the blog Crewof42 on the Congressional Black Caucus. She is heard every Tuesday on WMCS 1290 in Milwaukee on Earl Ingram's show The Evening Rush as well as on WHUR and WPFW in Washington DC. You can e-mail her at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it and follow her on twitter at @crewof42

7 comments

  • Dan

    I just read about this case. I'm not following the big issue here? Is it the sentence? It seems pretty obvious that Marissa did in fact fire a gun in the house at the man (or at least near him). The point of firing the gun was to scare the man. Well she succeeded. That is in fact "aggravated assault with a deadly weapon". I hear no facts contesting this.

    So is the argument for Marissa that it is okay for women to do this if they are scared? Did he have a gun? I don't hear that in the story. She could have called the police. Did she? Nope.

    Let's put it another way. If it had been him who fired the gun the night she blackened his eye, would that have been okay? Just to scare her off when she was obviously attacking him? He'd have been in jail and there would be no websites set up claiming injustice.

    Don't get me wrong here. 20 years is long, but that is the law. If you disagree, get the law changed.

    Dan Wednesday, 30 May 2012 21:13 Comment Link
  • Jim Donahough

    This is a terrible piece. Please go read a non one sided article. Im about as liberal as they come but when you go read an article with real journalistic integrity you find out the following.

    1. She fired not once, but several times going from the kitchen wall and into the living room (where her husband was)
    2. After she was arrested, attempted to fake an injury (cut herself under her eye) to claim it was her husband.
    3. After she was let out on bail originally she went back to his house (there was a restraining order) got in a dispute and gave him a swollen eye.
    4. The original testimony of the children at the site were against her accusing her of being the aggressor.

    I don't know or claim to know exactly what happened but, with all that info it would seem she has just as many screws loose as her abusive husband. This is why stand your ground does not apply. If you have time to leave the house get a weapon, come back and fire at someone through a wall.. you are not standing your ground.

    Jim Donahough Monday, 14 May 2012 15:21 Comment Link
  • Delphi1

    What is sad is that we still expect "fairness" from people whose main purpose is the demise of people of color. I don't expect narrow-minded racists to disagree with what's happening. They think that components like fairness should only be afforded the "white" "majority".
    This-too- shall pass.

    Delphi1 Sunday, 13 May 2012 20:36 Comment Link
  • TJ Larson

    Support amendments to the Stand Your Ground laws and a review of Marissa Alexander's case...
    http://voices.yahoo.com/stand-ground-strikes-again-11306424.html

    TJ Larson Saturday, 12 May 2012 20:22 Comment Link
  • Suga

    This is so unjustified. She did not harm anyone unlike her crazy exhusband who physically abused her. This is ridiculous she was in deed full of fear. Angela Cory is a fuckin idiot without a heart. To really judge her emotions like this. This woman was full of different emotions. That prosecutor is full of pure bull shit. This woman need to be freed. The SHITTY law work for the fair skin and not the dark skin. Racism conti ue to live. This is sick. Its as if she killed him. Them fuckers who killed that beat that child in the bootcamp down there were not even killed and the boy died now this man was not hit at all. And this tough sent when she has a new born. They are fuckin heartless.

    Suga Friday, 11 May 2012 16:51 Comment Link
  • liberal

    I would normally agree with you. However, Zimmerman I'm sure is who you are referring to, is not white. The inequity appears to be against women. My opinion is such that if all women understood their right to ward off men who would physically harm them...our nation would be without a great number of men. It would make us all look very hard at ourselces and each other as men and women.

    liberal Sunday, 29 April 2012 07:21 Comment Link
  • William

    It appears this law was made so white folk & others could shoot and kill off black folks, they felt threatened by and claim self defense. But when black folks try to use this as there defense, they go straight to jail and remain there. If they are going to use this law, it has to be fair to all.

    William Tuesday, 24 April 2012 19:34 Comment Link

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated. HTML code is not allowed.

Featured Poll

Do you agree with Mayor Vincent Gray’s decision to enable the Department of Motor Vehicles to issue a driver's license, learner's permit, or identification card to undocumented District residents?